Source: The Van Gogh Gallery
Thought for the Week
When you’re “a creative,” i.e. a person who creates original works of any type, you struggle continually to make something meaningful. Your art form—writing, music, photography, whatever—probably has some kind of “rules.” But following those rules, or breaking them for that matter, doesn’t guarantee a meaningful result. Does anything? Yes! And I can sum it up in a single word:
Nazz.
I’m guessing you want an explanation. When I was young, as a member of “the next Beatles,” I was constantly trying to figure out what made a song memorable. And then I stumbled on a singer-songwriter name Todd Rundgren who’d written and produced a string of infectious singles. Like me, Todd had sought to find that “something.” He found it, and went on to be one of the most influential music producers in history.
Analyzing what he found, I realized that literally all memorable songs had three rings, as it were, and I dubbed these “nazz” in honor of Todd’s first band The Nazz. Later, after spotting it in Van Gogh’s paintings and in a jazz ballet by Alvin Ailey, I realized nazz was the “something,” the bullseye for virtually all creative forms.
Creating nazz means creating something that to your viewers, listeners, or readers:
- Is unexpected, a melody that juxtaposes notes or chords in a way they didn’t anticipate, or a story with a plot turn they didn’t see coming (the transitions in “Yesterday,” the set-up for Les Miserables or ending of The Sixth Sense), and yet…
- Instantly feels “right” or necessary when they see, hear, or experience it (which means step one can’t simply be random or meaningless), which therefore…
- Surprises them, creating a sense of delight or fascination that lingers, and maybe even haunts them long afterward.
And there it is. Easy to say, hard to accomplish. But hopefully now, as a creative, you’ll at least have a little better sense of what that bullseye looks like. It looks like, well…
Nazz.
I love that you have come up with a formula – and it makes sense even as it is hard to do. But that #2, “instantly feels right” is such a wonderful way of putting that sweet spot when Truth hits people regardless of experience, perspective and background! Thanks, Mitch!
LikeLiked by 3 people
We loved seeing the Van Gogh paintings in Holland ..We have a copy of this ..
LikeLiked by 2 people
You are so right–nazz is easy to say, hard to accomplish.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mitch,
As a TR fan from waaay back, I can understand your description in his music. Great definition, great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aha, a fellow-Rundgren fan. Not a lot of people these days know his name, but they’ve heard his songs, and many of the classic albums and singles he produced.
LikeLike
The formula you came up with makes sense and very well explained.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Michael.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Welcome. My pleasure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So that’s why the ending of Christy by Catherine Marshall is so satisfying, and that every time I read it the ending was a satisfying surprise. Hmm, need to read it again, but I just pulled out the Narnia books to reread.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, and yes! ;>)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another one like Todd, was Warren Zevon…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed.
LikeLike
What a lovely subject and thoughtful admiring writing!
You could sum it up in a single word, beautifully:
“originality’ + “salt” + “special energetic signature” of the artist/creator that makes a work eternal = Nazzi!
Thank you.
Blessings,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good afternoon Mitch: By chance, did you ever meet John Braheny? I met him in Hollywood when he was a producer of music. Spent a bit of time crashing with him. Oh, by the way, all those stories on Gators grace notes are true stories in my life. Try the motorcycle pilgrimage series or 40 acres of musicians.’Escape and capture’ isn’t too bad either. It’s pretty good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said but knowing and finding that “Nazz” is always a bit like miracle and no amount of trying helps.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You make Nazz look easy, Mitch!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well put! I’m still figuring out what that looks like for my own writing, but I know it will get there!
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a Dazz moment in the 2017 Batman with Michael Keaton. Fun!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do you mean the Lego Batman movie, Susan? And “Dazz”? On purpose, or just a typo?
LikeLike
Oops! Nazz. And the Spider Man movie is: Spider Man Homecoming. 2017. If you enjoy nazz, check it out sometime !
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you’re describing something that I’ve noticed as well. The reason why “Luke, I am your father” lands so well is not just because it is a surprise, but because it is a surprise that somehow feels truer than our previous notion that Darth Vader had killed Luke’s father.
Stories that only subvert expectations simply for the sake of being subversive miss the fact that surprises only land when they somehow makes the overall experience feel more right and complete.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Yes, and great example, Abe.
LikeLike
I agree… easy to say; hard to accomplish. You forgot to mention that most people find it impossible to know what’s missing from their work to begin with. Thanks for articulating it. That feels like half the battle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Hitting the Creative Bullseye – MobsterTiger
Nazz… Great word Mitch. The idea of giving your readers something to consider, chew on, and to constantly come back to, is very appealing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looking for my Nazz every day. God bless, Mitch. Great post!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, dear friend.
LikeLike
Really
LikeLike
Pingback: Witty Remark – Surprised By Joy
Mitch,
On the nazz with that one. Yes, creatives have to have good outlets, but not too many in order to focus their craft.
Thanks,
Gary
LikeLiked by 1 person
Todd’s an adventurous guy. He always has liked to test himself and to expand his horizons. Worthy approaches!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some great proofs in math are like that too. Bhaskara’s proof of Pythagoras’ Theorem and Leonardo’s pizza-cutting proof of the formula for the area of a circle are prime examples. The whole approach is utterly unexpected, but the rightness of the basic idea is instantly obvious before any fastidious checking of details. W/o even trying, the reader memorizes the proof and treasures it ever after, with delight tinged by a little regret at not having thought of something so obvious in hindsight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Resourceful…
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Rhemalogy and commented:
Here are some helpful writer’s tips from Mitch Teemley. He’s a Writer, Filmaker, Humorist, Thinker-about-stuffer and my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hope you don’t mind but I needed a filler for my writer’s tips this week. These last couple weeks have been really hectic and I do love this post. Blessings and Peace!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, I’m honored, as always, Claudia. And blessings and peace to you too, my friend.
LikeLike
interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person